Analysis Finds Significant Discrepancy in DOJ’s List of Alleged Noncitizen Voters in California
An analysis found that over 40% of names on a Department of Justice list of alleged noncitizen voters in California could not be found on the state's voter rolls.
Sacramento Stockton Modesto, CA, October 31, 2026 —
An independent analysis has revealed a significant discrepancy between a list compiled by the Department of Justice (DOJ) alleging noncitizens voted in California and the state’s official voter registration records. According to the analysis, more than 40% of the names appearing on the DOJ’s list could not be located on California’s voter rolls.
The findings suggest a potential overstatement or inaccuracy in the federal agency’s claims regarding noncitizen voter participation in the state. The specific source and methodology of the DOJ’s list were not detailed in the summary provided, nor was the exact number of names contained within it. Similarly, the entity or individual that conducted the recent analysis, and the precise timeframe of its investigation, were not specified.
The process of identifying and removing ineligible voters is a key component of election integrity efforts. Voter registration systems typically cross-reference information with other government databases to verify citizenship status. However, this analysis indicates that a substantial portion of individuals flagged by the DOJ as potentially having voted illegally as noncitizens may not have been registered to vote in California at all.
This discrepancy raises questions about the accuracy of data used in such investigations and the reliability of lists generated by federal agencies concerning voter eligibility. The summary did not include information on any response from the Department of Justice to these findings or outline the next steps, if any, that would be taken by either the state or federal authorities.
For election officials, the challenge lies in ensuring that only eligible citizens are registered and that the electoral process remains secure and trustworthy. The analysis’s findings could prompt further scrutiny of data management and cross-referencing protocols employed by various government bodies involved in voter integrity initiatives.
Story summarized from the original created by NICHOLAS RICCARDI, Associated Press on fox40.com, see more information here.
Media gallery
